🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn connections viewing you as a thought leader? Are hordes of respondents praising your insights on growing your venture? Are headhunters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the explanation might be your gender.

The Experiment: Changing Gender Identity for Increased Reach

Numerous women joined an organized professional network test recently following viral posts suggested that changing their profile gender to "male" boosted their network presence.

Other testers modified their professional summaries to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" terminology - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "propel", "transform" and "accelerate". Based on reports, their visibility similarly increased.

Systemic Preference Concerns Raised

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether an inherent gender bias in LinkedIn's algorithm favors men who use professional networking terminology.

Like many large social media platforms, LinkedIn utilizes an algorithm to decide which content are shown to which members - boosting some while suppressing others.

Company Statement

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn recognized the phenomenon but stated it does not factor in "personal characteristics" when determining content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "numerous factors" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender on your profile does not influence how your posts appears in results or timelines.

Individual Results

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "male pronouns" and her profile name to "Simon E", reported remarkable results.

"The statistics I'm observing indicate a sixteen-fold rise in profile views and a 1,300% increase in content views," she noted.

Another professional, a marketing expert, began experimenting after noticing her audience decline substantially.

The Method

• First, she modified her profile gender to "man"
• Then, she used artificial intelligence to rewrite her professional summary using "male-coded" language
• Finally, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" style

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in visibility within seven days.

The Downside

Although the positive results, Cornish expressed dissatisfaction with the method.

"Before, my posts were more personal - brief and insightful, but also friendly and relatable," she explained. "Now, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - similar to a Caucasian man swaggering around."

She abandoned the experiment after seven days, saying "Every day I continued, and results improved, I became more frustrated."

Varying Outcomes

Some testers encountered favorable outcomes. One writer who changed both her gender to "male" and her ethnicity to "Caucasian" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We know there's algorithmic bias, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she remarked.

Wider Consequences

These experiments coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's unique position as both a professional network and community site.

Recent changes in the past few months have apparently resulted in women professionals experiencing markedly lower exposure, leading to informal experiments where the same content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

According to LinkedIn, the network uses artificial intelligence to categorize and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the user's professional identity.

The company states it regularly evaluates its algorithms, including "checks for gender-related disparities."

A spokesperson suggested that recent declines in certain members' visibility might originate from increased competition due to additional posts on the network.

Changing Landscape

As one participant observed, "bro-coding" appears to be growing on the platform.

"People often view LinkedIn as more businesslike and refined," she remarked. "This is evolving. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and less controlled."