🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours prior to the New York race for mayor, Michael Lange issued a bold forecast – going beyond who would win overall, and precinct by precinct. Lange, a political analyst who grew up in the city, has spent more than ten years in progressive politics and emerged as a kind of well-known figure this year for his thorough analyses into municipal statistics and voter surveys.

He released his extremely precise forecast map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win although missing Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his Substack, his platform. He has a flair for clever terms. He highlighted, as an example, the divide between the progressive stronghold, stretching from one neighborhood to another area to Astoria, where he predicted (correctly) that Mamdani would win by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, certain media outlets and Wall Street Journal outrank the mainstream paper” in audience and most voters leaned toward Cuomo, campaigning as a conservative-courting independent.

Voting Day Trends and Unexpected Results

How was your election night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the system every few minutes! I felt a little nervous at the beginning: Mamdani was ahead the initial ballots by 12 points, but came two big batches of ballots that came in later and his lead went from 12 to 8%. I was worried.

You know, there was a world where election day turned out kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the earlier contest. But the winner gained 500,000 votes to his initial base, and this was critical why he won. He went out and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Expanding Support

Where did the mayor-elect gain those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that progressives always wanted to build: it’s multiracial, youthful, it’s renters and individuals squeezed by affordability. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, everyday New Yorkers, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and immigrant groups. Victory required without making those significant inroads.

He built the coalition that the left long aimed for: multiracial, youthful, renters and residents struggling with costs

There were also a number of supporters of both candidates – is that a big trend?

It is a genuine phenomenon, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in ethnic enclaves that supported the former president last year went for the progressive now. However I wouldn’t say he was winning over white working-class voters and Trump loyalists.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the election was the sky-high participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Turnout was much greater than anticipated. I thought it could exceed two million, but it’s closer to 2.3 million – that is a huge number of participants. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, who were motivated, but the Mamdani base was equally driven, and that sufficed to secure victory.

You forecasted he’d get over half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Right now it appears he’s likely to get over 50%. He’s at just over 50% but there’s still around 200,000 votes left to report at that time. Thus it’s not certain, but I think probable, and I hope he does because then none can claim Sliwa was a spoiler.

Republican Collapse

Curtis Sliwa, the Republican candidate, was another surprise. His vote plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Including one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump area. That really was unexpected. The independent kept Caucasian districts, very wealthy areas and devout communities, and plus gained many conservatives on Staten Island who had a strong turnout. I think occurred significant strategic balloting by GOP voters. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for Cuomo, but it assisted. It could have even turned the tide unless Mamdani’s coalition hadn’t grown.

Progressive Strongholds

What about your much mentioned “commie corridor” – was support for the candidate overwhelming in those areas of the boroughs?

I think existed some weakening of the commie corridor in certain places like Astoria or Greenpoint that have older Caucasian residents. There, instance, the Greek landlords and homeowners supported the independent. Thus there existed a little resistance. However no, largely the commie corridor is another huge reason why Mamdani prevailed – he was polling between high percentages in Fort Greene, Clinton Hill and Bushwick.

Jewish Voters

In the lead-up to the election there was coverage on whether Mamdani was making inroads with Jewish New Yorkers. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are neighborhoods with a lot of secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as specific locales – where he did well. However in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered in those places. Likewise in the moderate communities including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Bronx areas – they all leaned the independent. Plus, there are newcomers from the former Soviet Union in southern Brooklyn, who were strongly Cuomo. Therefore I don’t know if there were major surprises here, but he did hold left-leaning areas and including sections of the another locale with large leads.

Long-Term Significance

Did Mamdani redefine what the city means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s not accidental that some of the biggest figures from progressives come from a handful of neighborhoods in the boroughs. I believe that we’ll see more of that – people will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I believe that every city in America can have their own commie corridor. Cities are the centers of leftwing power in America – since they’re young, people rent and they are places where individuals struggle by the disparities exist.