🔗 Share this article

As a DM, I usually avoided significant use of luck during my tabletop roleplaying sessions. I tended was for story direction and what happened in a game to be determined by player choice rather than the roll of a die. However, I decided to change my approach, and I'm truly happy with the result.

The Spark: Seeing an Improvised Tool

A popular actual-play show utilizes a DM who frequently calls for "luck rolls" from the players. He does this by choosing a specific dice and assigning possible results contingent on the number. This is fundamentally no different from consulting a random table, these are created on the spot when a player's action doesn't have a obvious conclusion.

I decided to try this approach at my own table, mainly because it appeared novel and presented a departure from my usual habits. The results were remarkable, prompting me to think deeply about the ongoing dynamic between preparation and spontaneity in a D&D campaign.

A Memorable In-Game Example

During one session, my players had survived a large-scale fight. Afterwards, a cleric character wondered if two key NPCs—a sibling duo—had lived. Rather than picking a fate, I handed it over to chance. I instructed the player to make a twenty-sided die roll. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both died; a middling roll, a single one would die; on a 10+, they both lived.

Fate decreed a 4. This resulted in a incredibly poignant scene where the party discovered the bodies of their companions, forever clasped together in their final moments. The group held last rites, which was particularly powerful due to earlier story developments. As a parting touch, I decided that the remains were strangely restored, containing a magical Prayer Bead. I randomized, the bead's magical effect was exactly what the group lacked to solve another major story problem. It's impossible to orchestrate these kinds of perfect story beats.

Improving Your Improvisation

This experience made me wonder if chance and making it up are actually the beating heart of D&D. While you are a detail-oriented DM, your improvisation muscles need exercise. Players reliably take delight in ignoring the most detailed narratives. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to adapt swiftly and fabricate details on the fly.

Employing on-the-spot randomization is a excellent way to develop these skills without venturing too far outside your usual style. The key is to deploy them for low-stakes situations that won't drastically alter the overarching story. To illustrate, I would avoid using it to decide if the central plot figure is a traitor. Instead, I would consider using it to decide whether the PCs reach a location moments before a major incident unfolds.

Enhancing Collaborative Storytelling

This technique also helps keep players engaged and foster the feeling that the story is dynamic, evolving based on their choices in real-time. It combats the feeling that they are merely actors in a pre-written narrative, thereby enhancing the cooperative foundation of storytelling.

This philosophy has always been part of the original design. Early editions were enamored with charts, which fit a playstyle focused on exploration. While modern D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, it's not necessarily the best approach.

Achieving the Sweet Spot

Absolutely no problem with doing your prep. But, there is also nothing wrong with relinquishing control and permitting the rolls to guide minor details in place of you. Authority is a major part of a DM's job. We use it to facilitate play, yet we frequently find it hard to release it, at times when doing so can lead to great moments.

The core advice is this: Have no fear of relinquishing a bit of the reins. Embrace a little randomness for minor story elements. The result could create that the unexpected outcome is far more memorable than anything you could have planned by yourself.